On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 23:21 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 04:36:56 am Frank Murphy wrote: > > On 12/10/10 01:57, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > >> Dean > > > > > > any reason you did not use grub2 that is in fedora? > > > > > > Dennis > > > > Since J Katz left, unsure it anyone has worked on it. > I have been making sure it works. Any comment on result of build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641739 how do you have solve the "BuildRequires: glibc-static.i686". i would like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452371 to be something that work, suggestion is BuildRequires: glibc-static(i686) http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/64.fc13/data/logs/x86_64/build.log examination of that file make me very unhappy. | grep -e 'configure.in' are you sure somebody is checking output. for x86_64 system 639979 grub does boot system on a second drive 639539 configfile <file> does not work irc is anemic to resolve such thing > It still needs alot of work to be a drop in > replacement for legacy grub. I have some of my machines using grub2 i use > the rpms in fedora. you can use grub2-install to install to disk. only gotcha > is that you need to use grub2-foo not grub-foo as most docs have. it lives > purely coinstallable with grub until such time as it can be a official > replacement. > > Dennis -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
