On 09/30/2010 10:00 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 00:43:28 +0100, > Sam Sharpe<lists.redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 1 October 2010 00:40, Gordon Messmer<yinyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 09/30/2010 08:56 AM, James Mckenzie wrote: >>>> However, be aware that Fedora tries to be on a six month or shorter >>>> release cycle. Fedora is basically a 'wide beta' for RedHat and that >>>> is also stated on the Project's web page. >>> Where is that stated? >> It isn't stated in those terms, but it is an accepted representation of the >> status quo. > Not universally. There is a difference between being a beta and being an > early show case of new technologies. > > As for 'stable', that depends on what the original poster meant by that. > If he meant a release that he could run on for several years without > a major upgrade, then no version of Fedora is stable. If he meant a version > where things are expected to work, then Fedora might be suitable. For me, software that does not change much over the years is a very boring prospect :) :) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
