On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 00:43:28 +0100, Sam Sharpe <lists.redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1 October 2010 00:40, Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/30/2010 08:56 AM, James Mckenzie wrote: > >> However, be aware that Fedora tries to be on a six month or shorter > >> release cycle. Fedora is basically a 'wide beta' for RedHat and that > >> is also stated on the Project's web page. > > > > Where is that stated? > > It isn't stated in those terms, but it is an accepted representation of the > status quo. Not universally. There is a difference between being a beta and being an early show case of new technologies. As for 'stable', that depends on what the original poster meant by that. If he meant a release that he could run on for several years without a major upgrade, then no version of Fedora is stable. If he meant a version where things are expected to work, then Fedora might be suitable. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
