Re: F13: services marked as disabled, are shown to be running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 09:22 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 08:15 AM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 21:53 -0700, JD wrote:
> >> On 08/22/2010 09:16 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:52 -0700, JD wrote:
> >>>> There is a problem with system-config-services.
> >>> JD,
> >>>
> >>> I would have to agree. Time to BZ s-c-s. Fortunately chkconfig and ps
> >>> give you independent confirmations that the unwanted services are not
> >>> actually running, no matter what s-c-s may say.
> >> Which is fine, if you want to do these extra steps to get this
> >> sort of confirmation.
> >> But the whole purpose of this util is to tell you at a glance.
> >> And it is giving contradictory info.
> >> If a servce is disabled, and I have nothing that starts it, then
> >> the sys config services should not say the status is running.
> >> In fact, even clicking on Stop, the status remains 'running'.
> >> Also, I am not sure if this bug should be filed against Fedora,
> >> as it is present in other distros.
> > JD,
> >
> > Go ahead and submit a Bugzilla report against s-c-s citing exactly what
> > you are seeing, what it's not doing, etc. It's been my experience that
> > the service-config-whatever scripts often get lost in the shuffle of new
> > packages. When their maintainers get good descriptive Bugzilla reports,
> > they can frequently push out a good fix in short order.
> >
> > For example, about six months ago a problem with system-config-httpd was
> > fixed after lying dormant for almost two releases. IIRC that problem
> > turned out to be in alchemy, used by s-c-h. It took the maintainer a
> > couple of months to find and fix the problem, but he eventually got it.
> >
> > Good luck.
> > --Doc Savage
> >    Fairview Heights, IL
> >
> OK. Sounds reasonable.
> I am wondering whether or not to open the bug in
> Fedora bugzilla or the more general Redhat Bugzilla?
> Is there a feedback loop between fedora bugzilla and redhat bugzilla?

JD,

I'd submit it under F13 s-c-s and let the maintainers decide where to
apply the fix.

--Doc Savage
  Fairview Heights, IL

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux