On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 21:53 -0700, JD wrote: > On 08/22/2010 09:16 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:52 -0700, JD wrote: > >> There is a problem with system-config-services. > > JD, > > > > I would have to agree. Time to BZ s-c-s. Fortunately chkconfig and ps > > give you independent confirmations that the unwanted services are not > > actually running, no matter what s-c-s may say. > Which is fine, if you want to do these extra steps to get this > sort of confirmation. > But the whole purpose of this util is to tell you at a glance. > And it is giving contradictory info. > If a servce is disabled, and I have nothing that starts it, then > the sys config services should not say the status is running. > In fact, even clicking on Stop, the status remains 'running'. > Also, I am not sure if this bug should be filed against Fedora, > as it is present in other distros. JD, Go ahead and submit a Bugzilla report against s-c-s citing exactly what you are seeing, what it's not doing, etc. It's been my experience that the service-config-whatever scripts often get lost in the shuffle of new packages. When their maintainers get good descriptive Bugzilla reports, they can frequently push out a good fix in short order. For example, about six months ago a problem with system-config-httpd was fixed after lying dormant for almost two releases. IIRC that problem turned out to be in alchemy, used by s-c-h. It took the maintainer a couple of months to find and fix the problem, but he eventually got it. Good luck. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
