Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 19:54 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:57:55 -0700
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
> 
> > I understand your concern and see the merit in keeping the default 
> > get-fedora page simple, but I fail to see how that implies no page 
> > linking to either of these pages. (or maybe I didn't look long enough)
> 
> I like the default page too, but the default page has a link on
> it with the text "View full list of options for getting Fedora ...",
> that page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options isn't
> remotely close to a full list of options for getting fedora.

See, those aren't options for 'getting' Fedora, they are Fedora
options... see below...
> 
> No possible train of logic involving mythical average users can
> justify leaving download options off of a page claiming to be
> all the download options.

The wording is a little confusing - we offer way too many options. 

When you read 'download options', you think, 'methods of downloading.'
The way 'download options' was originally intended, however, was to
mean, 'different variations of Fedora' - options like Desktop,
Architecture, etc. Options for FEDORA, not how you were DOWNLOADING it.

Fair enough, part of the patch I put together for the site rewords the
text to say, "View more Fedora options" rather than "View full list of
options for getting Fedora." You can see the patch and a screenshot
here:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/2010-May/008043.html

> And while this thread is talking about the response of average
> users to the download page, what about the average users who
> want to try fedora for the first time and are disgusted to
> discover that fedora apparently doesn't have any mirrors or
> torrent support.

I don't think those users are really in the majority to be quite honest:

http://mairin.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/getting-fedora-survey-results/

Less than 1/3 for sure... 

>  After all the page claims to be "full list of
> options". Why would I go do searches for things not mentioned
> on the page that already claims to be everything?

I agree the wording is confusing, I hope the change mentioned above
helps address the issue.

~m

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux