On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some also have security impact. Basically the problem is that it is extremly > hard to provide the ABI/config stability for clamav. Combined with a few > questionable decisions when it came to packaging + a not-so-active maintainer > and we have a basically orphaned package in EPEL. This poses the question, is EPEL the ideal place for clamav when it's a constantly moving target? Maybe fedora/epel needs something akin to the debian volatile repo for things like clamav. (We probably already have this in conceptual terms from rpmforge) Regards, Dan -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
