On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:59:39 +0200 Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 21.04.2010 06:33, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:46:33 +1000 > > Dan Irwin<rummymobile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> The clamav packages in EPEL are quite broken, and don't work out of > >> the box. I think this has been the case for many months. > > > > Have you filed any bugs? Whats broken? > > There are a couple of bugs: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=clamav&product=Fedora%20EPEL Sure, there are bugs. > Some also have security impact. Basically the problem is that it is > extremly hard to provide the ABI/config stability for clamav. > Combined with a few questionable decisions when it came to packaging > + a not-so-active maintainer and we have a basically orphaned package > in EPEL. Yeah. ;( I'll see what I can do. > I've spoken to a few Fedora packagers who where interested in > maintaining the package. However the premise for them was that they > can also decide how the Fedora package should look like - and at that > time the current maintainer had strong feelings about this topic... And still does I am sure. > If you could initiate a discussion on epel-devel, I can ping a few of > the previously interested people... Feel free to start discussion on that list. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
