On 7 April 2010 21:59, Marcel Rieux <m.z.rieux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My point was that he wasn't breaking even. Rahul said that since Ubuntu is > not a public company, it's impossible to know this for sure. And we don't. > > But I read an interview with Shuttleworth less than 3 months ago and he > certainly said so and though he's certainly a very shrewd businessman, I > didn't hear anybody contesting this claim. You answered this in your first paragraph. No-one possesses the facts apart from Mark Shuttleworth so no-one can contest the claim. Lack of evidence to the contrary is not considered proof of a hypothesis and to my standards of reason never has been. > "I have seen all that data before but I don't see the point you are > trying to make. You might as well as state it directly." > > Given the discussion we had here on some developers "contributing their > work" for free... and others receiving a paltry pay in India, does anybody > here have a problem understanding what I mean? Yes. You don't seem to have a point. I don't think Rahul is alone in feeling this. What are you trying to say exactly? -- Sam -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
