On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:36 PM, psmith <psmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I, for one, have no objection with Fedora being used as a test bench for RHEL: if RH invests in Fedora, it should get a return on investment. This is normal business.
OTOH, I'm really glad that there is absolutely no problem at RH/Fedora (RHF) since, after checking insiders tradings at Yahoo, if there was a problem, I would truly have no idea on how to solve it. I can't figure how the figures I see there are compatible with developers working for Red Hat for free... Ooops! I meant "contributing their work" for free.
So, no problem and no solution: everything is fine.
Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his developers and doesn't get a cent back... for now.
On 01/04/10 23:44, Craig White wrote:you are joking right? fedora is just a testing ground for redhat (think
> I do have faith that Fedora governance is
> independent of Red Hat.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
selinux, pulseaudio, abrt etc etc), and the governance is full of
@redhat.com people
You know how it is, some people like to see things their way.
I, for one, have no objection with Fedora being used as a test bench for RHEL: if RH invests in Fedora, it should get a return on investment. This is normal business.
OTOH, I'm really glad that there is absolutely no problem at RH/Fedora (RHF) since, after checking insiders tradings at Yahoo, if there was a problem, I would truly have no idea on how to solve it. I can't figure how the figures I see there are compatible with developers working for Red Hat for free... Ooops! I meant "contributing their work" for free.
So, no problem and no solution: everything is fine.
Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his developers and doesn't get a cent back... for now.
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
