On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 01:29 +0000, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 4 February 2010 14:55, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes.... But, I think, is where the confusion came in. > > > > Even without the sftp.service file F11 would indicate sftp service > > availability. But, in both F11 and F12 there does exist a ssh.service > > file. So, apparently, the F11 client would presume that sftp service is > > also available since that is the same port as ssh. Now, it seems the > > F12 GNOME client only displays sftp if it is explicitly indicated in the > > response. > > In theory, you could almost "assume" that the SSH service being > available, meant SFTP was available as it's pretty unusual to disable > SFTP transfers via SSH. That may have been the old behaviour of Gnome > in F11. > > However, the "correct" behaviour is not to make assumptions and only > show the services that are advertised. > > I see in a slightly different thread that we're talking about > Bugzilla'ing this against Nautilus in F12 - I'm not sure that this is > correct. If anything it's a bug against Nautilus in F11 which has > already been corrected. > > -- > Sam But doewsn't the ssh.service filwe cause an ssh service to be advertised. Why is that noot sufficient to cause the fedora icons to be shown in Places->Network? -- ======================================================================= The older a man gets, the farther he had to walk to school as a boy. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
