Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 16:29:43 +0800, > Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >>> >> I think you miss my point.... >> > > No, but the technical explanation was later on in the message. Because at > least some of the fedora lists mung reply-to, I strip them out so that > it doesn't break the reply function (which is only supposed to reply to > the address(es) in the from header). So when I do a reply all, if you > haven't set mail-followup-to to say just reply to the list, two messages > will be sent, one to the list and one directly to your address. And if > you have duplicates off in your mailman configuration, mailman will note > that you appear to be getting a separate copy and not send you a copy > through the list. The copy you get directly from me will not have a reply-to > header added. > IMHO, you are causing more damage than you think you are fixing.... I sincerely wish you'd stop your misguided practice. I really hate having to be on guard for these types of "fixes"..... -- Bender: I get a good vibe from this place. Nice long dinner table, quiet well-behaved spiders, graveyards adjacent.... Guess Who! http://tinyurl.com/mc4xe7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
