Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:43:32 +0800, > Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Frankly....I'd recommend you use the "forwarders" approach since this >> will allow you to take advantage of the cache your ISP has collected and >> should result is quicker DNS responses. >> > > That depends on your ISP. For some ISPs, using their cache is a bad thing. > There are some ISPs, for example, that change TTLs and that can cause > unexpected delays in propagation of updates. It's probably less likely > now, but in the past cache poisoning was a problem and your ISP's cache > make have bad data in it. > I would still take the "forwarders" route as a first choice and only change if needed. As you said, "it depends", and that is true of many areas where choice is involved. Kind of why YMMV is a good caveat. FWIW, my experience only spans 4 ISPs in Asia and in all cases the "forwarders" configuration worked well. As an aside, I wonder why your email client seems to be ignoring the "Reply-To:" in this list mails. I'm "trained" to only use "Reply" with this and other mailing lists and only just noticed that doing so resulted in a "To:" to you only and I had to manually adjust. -- Work Hard. Rock Hard. Eat Hard. Sleep Hard. Grow Big. Wear Glasses If You Need 'Em. -- The Webb Wilder Credo Guess Who! http://tinyurl.com/mc4xe7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
