gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Nobody said that. What people are trying to tell you is that Fedora >> is aimed at people that like to try new things, and help fix then >> when they break. > > That's what rawhide is for. I see no purpose in releasing a final version > with, for instance, Brasero not working, and Totem not much either, I'm > afraid. > Rawhide is just the first step in testing. The way I think of it is that rawhide is alpha testing for the next release. Updates-testing is alpha test for the current release. The current release of Fedora is beta testing. The finished product is the Redhat Enterprise Edition and its derivatives are the finished produce. > See my last posrt entitled "Why Fedora is for experts only?" and tell me > who benefits from having no pause to choose a kernel. Whenever I'm proved > wrong, I confess my error. Until then, I stand my ground whatever some > "experts" may say. > You need to pick better subjects - I already deleted that thread as not being something I was interested in. So I don't know what you are talking about. Did it stick to one topic, or was it a long rambling rant where the actual problem was only a small part of it? I probably haven't seen the problem, what ever it is, because I do no run a stock grub.conf - I happen to like to see system messages instead of a fancy boot screen. But I also like to see the POST messages from the BIOS, while the current trend seams to be to cover those up too. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
