> gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I would bet that Ubuntu has pretty much all bugs I have noted until now" >> So, I can't see what's the difference. >> > Don't guess. Try it and find out. I tried it and found out. After using Amarok for 15 minutes, i couldn't log in anymore: both my passwords had been changed. >> Fedora is not really a good distro for newbies... or anybody not wishing >> to make Brasero burn and the clipboards working properly, you say? Then >> who are final releases for? >> > Nobody said that. What people are trying to tell you is that Fedora > is aimed at people that like to try new things, and help fix then > when they break. That's what rawhide is for. I see no purpose in releasing a final version with, for instance, Brasero not working, and Totem not much either, I'm afraid. > You almost have the Karl Larson mode down perfect. You are right, > and everyone else is wrong. See my last posrt entitled "Why Fedora is for experts only?" and tell me who benefits from having no pause to choose a kernel. Whenever I'm proved wrong, I confess my error. Until then, I stand my ground whatever some "experts" may say. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
