On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:16:39AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:36:18AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> A late discovered and just potentially fixed anaconda storage bug[1] has > >> necessitated another week slip of our schedule. The change is important > >> but invasive enough to require re-validating our storage tests. We were > >> already late in producing the Release Candidate and there is not enough > >> time to produce another one and validate it in time for next Tuesday's > >> release date. Therefor we have decided to enact another week long slip > >> of the release. This gives us time to create a second release candidate > >> and fully validate it and hand it off to the mirrors in plenty of time > >> to sync up for the new release date of June 9th. As much as we regret > >> slipping, we also wish to avoid easily trigger-able bugs in our release, > >> particularly in software that cannot be fixed with a 0-day update. > >> > >> At this time we would only accept tag requests for critical issues. > >> > >> [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500808 > > > > Does it make sense to fold in the f11 updates into the next preview > > release? E.g. to move all current updates back to rawhide? > > Little sense imo... no/little qa/testing, more work, more delay. Maybe that's even a reason to pull them in now. After all these 600+ packages will be on every F11 system from the first day, so if there is a problem, we better stumble over it now. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp3iJvtrivVB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
