Axel Thimm wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:36:18AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> A late discovered and just potentially fixed anaconda storage bug[1] has >> necessitated another week slip of our schedule. The change is important >> but invasive enough to require re-validating our storage tests. We were >> already late in producing the Release Candidate and there is not enough >> time to produce another one and validate it in time for next Tuesday's >> release date. Therefor we have decided to enact another week long slip >> of the release. This gives us time to create a second release candidate >> and fully validate it and hand it off to the mirrors in plenty of time >> to sync up for the new release date of June 9th. As much as we regret >> slipping, we also wish to avoid easily trigger-able bugs in our release, >> particularly in software that cannot be fixed with a 0-day update. >> >> At this time we would only accept tag requests for critical issues. >> >> [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500808 > > Does it make sense to fold in the f11 updates into the next preview > release? E.g. to move all current updates back to rawhide? Little sense imo... no/little qa/testing, more work, more delay. -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
