On Sunday 22 February 2009 08:39:34 Anne Wilson wrote: > On Sunday 22 February 2009 08:16:04 Ed Greshko wrote: > > That info came from the OpenPGP key management gui.... > > > > [egreshko@misty Jia-Ying]$ gpg --list-sigs cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > pub 1024D/C2C60518 2008-01-19 [expires: 2010-02-21] > > uid Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) > > <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> sig 31014A12 2008-02-14 [User ID not > > found] > > sig 3 C2C60518 2009-02-21 Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) > > <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > sig 3 C2C60518 2008-01-19 Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) > > <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > sig X CA57AD7C 2008-02-03 [User ID not found] > > C2C60518 gives the 2010 expiry date, as it says above. However, CA57AD7C > shows on mine as expiring on 18/01/09. I wonder why that is, and whether > that is the cause of the problem? > > There are some screwy things going on with gpg at the moment. Yesterday I > opened Robert's message and got a no-key, imported it, and all seemed well. > This morning the same message shows 'bad signature'. Something wrong, or > something not updated yesterday? I don't know. > > Robert, please send me an off-list signed message so that we can test the > simpler case. > Some corruption crept in somewhere. I deleted Robert's key, re-imported it, then refreshed all keys on my keyring. Now Robert's original message shows up correctly again. Screwy, but there you are. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
