On Sunday 22 February 2009 08:16:04 Ed Greshko wrote: > That info came from the OpenPGP key management gui.... > > [egreshko@misty Jia-Ying]$ gpg --list-sigs cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > pub 1024D/C2C60518 2008-01-19 [expires: 2010-02-21] > uid Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > sig 31014A12 2008-02-14 [User ID not found] > sig 3 C2C60518 2009-02-21 Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) > <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > sig 3 C2C60518 2008-01-19 Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) > <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > sig X CA57AD7C 2008-02-03 [User ID not found] C2C60518 gives the 2010 expiry date, as it says above. However, CA57AD7C shows on mine as expiring on 18/01/09. I wonder why that is, and whether that is the cause of the problem? There are some screwy things going on with gpg at the moment. Yesterday I opened Robert's message and got a no-key, imported it, and all seemed well. This morning the same message shows 'bad signature'. Something wrong, or something not updated yesterday? I don't know. Robert, please send me an off-list signed message so that we can test the simpler case. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
