Ed Greshko wrote: > Tim wrote: >> On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 20:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> I guess I only have one question.... >>> This was discussed and decided upon in August 2008 in the thread with >>> the title "The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list" and no objections >>> were raised at that time. >> I wonder whether any of the participants expected the list description >> to be stuffed into the "to address"? (There are other headers, more >> suitable for that, that can be read for search engine categorisation.) > Probably not.... And it took "only" 5+ months for anyone to take > exception to it...and even then only as an off shoot to a different > trivial matter. >> It looks silly, but it's not /that/ important. I'd far rather put more >> effort into getting the "unsubscribe" link in the signature relabelled >> as "subscription options," or something similarly more descriptive >> (subscription settings, or subscription choices, etc.), but still very >> short, instead of just unsubscribe. There has to be any number of >> people who won't click on it, thinking they'll unsubscribe themselves, >> when they wanted to change some aspect of their subscription, instead. > Maybe you need to start a different thread on that.... Or, maybe just > address it to the folks from that August thread that seem to be in a > position to change that sort of thing. Calm down Ed. The whole world economy is in the toilet. But who cares? *This is important*! ;-) But explain something. Why would you want the 'Recipient' in the line anyway? Curious minds want to know. another>> :-) -- David -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
