On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 20:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I guess I only have one question.... > > This was discussed and decided upon in August 2008 in the thread with > the title "The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list" and no objections > were raised at that time. I wonder whether any of the participants expected the list description to be stuffed into the "to address"? (There are other headers, more suitable for that, that can be read for search engine categorisation.) It looks silly, but it's not /that/ important. I'd far rather put more effort into getting the "unsubscribe" link in the signature relabelled as "subscription options," or something similarly more descriptive (subscription settings, or subscription choices, etc.), but still very short, instead of just unsubscribe. There has to be any number of people who won't click on it, thinking they'll unsubscribe themselves, when they wanted to change some aspect of their subscription, instead. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.12-78.2.8.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
