On Sunday 15 February 2009, Tim wrote: >On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 20:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I guess I only have one question.... >> >> This was discussed and decided upon in August 2008 in the thread with >> the title "The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list" and no objections >> were raised at that time. > >I wonder whether any of the participants expected the list description >to be stuffed into the "to address"? (There are other headers, more >suitable for that, that can be read for search engine categorisation.) I certainly didn't expect it to wind up in the To: header either, and would have said it was trash then. The discussion really wasn't clear as to the intent to actually modify the To: line header. >It looks silly, but it's not /that/ important. I'd far rather put more >effort into getting the "unsubscribe" link in the signature relabelled >as "subscription options," or something similarly more descriptive >(subscription settings, or subscription choices, etc.), but still very >short, instead of just unsubscribe. There has to be any number of >people who won't click on it, thinking they'll unsubscribe themselves, >when they wanted to change some aspect of their subscription, instead. Now that makes sense, but because it does, it probably won't be done. Sigh... -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Clay's Conclusion: Creativity is great, but plagiarism is faster. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
