On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:48 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Robin Laing <Robin.Laing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 20:53 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > >>> > >>> Not to over stretch this topic, but you have a Core2Duo with 4GB of > >>> RAM, so if you were seeing performance issues with Firefox, that would > >>> be it was _really_ slow as opposed to just slow. > >> > >> As I tried to explain, the performance was exactly the same when it only > >> had 2GB (I upgraded quite recently). > >> > >>> Additionally, using AdBlock actually makes it faster (for me). > >> > >> That's probably true for me as well. Also Flashblock stops downloading a > >> lot of superfluous video (I'm on a 1Mbps DSL line). > >> > >> poc > >> > > > > I have not followed this thread but last night when re-re-installing F10, > > there was a FF update and it got me thinking. Are the number of languages > > an issue still? I ask this as I was prompted to turn off a large list of > > languages. > > > > FWIW, I don't find FF slow on an old 1.4G machine. I just don't have that > > man plugins running. > > > > What does top say? > > 1.4GB slow to run a browser? What's your point? He said it's *not* slow. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
