On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Robin Laing <Robin.Laing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 20:53 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> >>> Not to over stretch this topic, but you have a Core2Duo with 4GB of >>> RAM, so if you were seeing performance issues with Firefox, that would >>> be it was _really_ slow as opposed to just slow. >> >> As I tried to explain, the performance was exactly the same when it only >> had 2GB (I upgraded quite recently). >> >>> Additionally, using AdBlock actually makes it faster (for me). >> >> That's probably true for me as well. Also Flashblock stops downloading a >> lot of superfluous video (I'm on a 1Mbps DSL line). >> >> poc >> > > I have not followed this thread but last night when re-re-installing F10, > there was a FF update and it got me thinking. Are the number of languages > an issue still? I ask this as I was prompted to turn off a large list of > languages. > > FWIW, I don't find FF slow on an old 1.4G machine. I just don't have that > man plugins running. > > What does top say? 1.4GB slow to run a browser? -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
