On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 09:48 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> --- On Sat, 11/15/08, edwardspl@xxxxxxxxxx <edwardspl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: edwardspl@xxxxxxxxxx <edwardspl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
> > To: olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 7:06 AM
> > Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
> > >--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim
> > <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
> > >>To: olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx, "Community
> > assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
> > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
> > >>On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> > >>>}
> > >>>
> > >>># This is a very basic subnet declaration.
> > >>>
> > >>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
> > >>> range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
> > >>> option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>}
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet
> > twice.
> > >>And stranger
> > >>to declare it differently. I see no point for the
> > first
> > >>one.
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
> > >>2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
> > >>
> > >>Don't send private replies to my address, the
> > mailbox
> > >>is ignored. I
> > >>read messages from the public lists.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the
> > second one?
> > >
> > >I have tried before and not succeeded, I want to
> > succeed this time.
> > >
> > >The machine that will become the server has gateway
> > 10.154.19.1, is it okay to make the server
> > >10.154.19.0 ?
> > >
> > >Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the
> > netmask of the server should it be 255.255.255.0 or
> > 255.255.255.254 or other thing?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Antonio
> > >
> >
> > Dear You,
> >
> > Please try these :
> >
> > <>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224
> > {
> > range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
> > option routers
> > rtr-239-0-1.example.org,rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
> > }
> >
> > Good luck !
>
> I tried that and it does not work :(
>
> [root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/dhcpd.conf
> # dhcpd.conf
> #
> # Sample configuration file for ISC dhcpd
> #
>
> # option definitions common to all supported networks...
> #option domain-name "example.org";
> #option domain-name-servers ns1.example.org, ns2.example.org;
>
> default-lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time 7200;
>
> # Use this to enble / disable dynamic dns updates globally.
> ddns-update-style none;
>
> # If this DHCP server is the official DHCP server for the local
> # network, the authoritative directive should be uncommented.
> authoritative;
>
> # Use this to send dhcp log messages to a different log file (you also
> # have to hack syslog.conf to complete the redirection).
> log-facility local7;
>
> # No service will be given on this subnet, but declaring it helps the
> # DHCP server to understand the network topology.
>
> #subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> #}
>
> # This is a very basic subnet declaration.
>
> subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
> range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
> option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org, rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
> }
>
> [root@localhost ~]# dhcpd -f
> Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server 4.0.0
> Copyright 2004-2007 Internet Systems Consortium.
> All rights reserved.
> For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
> Not searching LDAP since ldap-server, ldap-port and ldap-base-dn were not specified in the config file
> Wrote 0 leases to leases file.
>
> No subnet declaration for eth0 (10.154.19.210).
> ** Ignoring requests on eth0. If this is not what
> you want, please write a subnet declaration
> in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment
> to which interface eth0 is attached. **
>
----
/etc/dhcpd.conf
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
ddns-update-style none;
authoritative;
log-facility local7;
subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
option domain-name-servers $DNS_SERVER_IP_ADDRESS_1, $DNS_SERVER_IP_ADDRESS_2;
option domain-name "$YOUR_DOMAIN_NAME";
option broadcast-address 10.154.19.31;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.224;
option routers 10.154.19.1 ; # just a guess
ddns-updates off;
}
/etc/sysconfig/dhcpd
DHCPDARGS=eth0 # recommended
# other things to note...default and max lease times are really short. Many more options can be added such as WINS, NTP servers, etc.
Webmin (http://www.webmin.com) makes a lot of this very trivial
Craig
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
