On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:27 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To > > > > header and not by subject? > > > > > > Evo *always* threads by In-Reply-To where present and AFAIK this cannot > > > be turned off. It only falls back to thread-by-subject when there's no > > > In-Reply-To header. > > > > > > > And if you thread by In-Reply-To hader threading how > > > > can you tell when the thread ends (since subject line can change)? > > > > > > Isn't that the whole point? If the In-Reply-To header indicates the > > > message is part of a thread, then it *is* part of the thread, no matter > > > what the Subject says. People changing the topic of the message (*not* > > > the Subject, which is irrelevant in this scenario) are hijacking the > > > thread. > > > > > > poc > > > > > That is not the answer to my question. The answer is that evolution > > places in front of the subject line to delineate the beginning and end > > of the thread, > > This last sentence doesn't parse. What are you trying to say? > > poc > I was trying to answer the question (which I screwed up by leaving out one or two words) of how the end of a thread is indicated in evolution. Tim answers this in the next message. -- ======================================================================= Eeny, Meeny, Jelly Beanie, the spirits are about to speak! -- Bullwinkle Moose ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
