Re: Arranging icons on desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:58 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 15:32 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 10:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 03:47 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 22:26 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > > Please stop hijacking threads. When you have a new topic, do *not*
> > > > > introduce it by replying to an existing message, even if you change the
> > > > > Subject line. This completely screws up message threading. This is the
> > > > > second time you've done it in the space of a few hours.
> > > > > 
> > > > > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
> > > > > 
> > > > > poc
> > > > > 
> > > > People keep saing this but I don't understand it. This "highjacking" did
> > > > not mess up my message threading, Why would the mess up happen?
> > > 
> > > If it's not messing it up, you're using a broken mail client which
> > > doesn't understand standard threading (see Tim's reply). I see you use
> > > Yahoo. Enough said.
> > > 
> > > poc
> > > 
> > No in evolution the terminology is different. I personally have not use
> > for threads which contain mail with different subject lines. But to each
> > his own.
> > 
> > Actually now that I think about it, I am not sure that evolution
> > supports threads of the type Tim describes.
> 
> It does. Evo is my preferred client and threading works as it's supposed
> to (i.e. using the In-Reply-To header). However there is also a
> preference option to allow it to fall back to subject-based threading
> when the standard method fails (look under the Preferences->Mail
> Preferences->General tab). This is mainly for compatibility with
> Outlook, which is broken in this regard.
> 
> poc
> 
Then we have a problem. I don't have the fall back to subject --- option
checked. But in the recent complaint about thread highjacking a thread I
did not see the hijacking in my mail list. So there is something
missing in the explanation given for the highjacking complaint.

How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To header
and not by subject? And if you thread by In-Reply-To hader threading how
can you tell when the thread ends (since subject line can change)?
--
=======================================================================
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." -- The Wizard Of Oz
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux