Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 11:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, sure. Feel free to look up the archives. >>>> >>> Different conversation, I guess. >>> >> You claimed a official Java implementation wouldn't have issues. OpenJDK >> is one. >> >> >>> Errr, that blog says it builds... Is it your/fedora's policy that if >>> something builds you should ship it? >>> >> You presume a lot without me saying anything of that as usual. >> > > What in the hell are you talking about? The sentence was a question, > not a statement, in text, no less. How obtuse do you have to be in > order to miss that? The real amusement tho kicks in when you assume the > presumption on his side when it's actually YOUR presumption to attempt > to make his question into a statement. Fyi: This ? usually means > question, and this . usually proceeds a statement. What you need to do > is finish your 9th year high school grammar courses. Did you ever > manage to finally get that GED? > You are not a native English speaker, right? The question itself is so outlandish that it is very doubtful that it is truly a question being asked. I'm sure there is a unique label for this type of literary technique...but it escapes me at the moment. -- "Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together." -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
