Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:47:45AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:29:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
In general the terms I'm speaking of are more permissive than the GPL
and the GPL is the one that was intentionally incompatible, but
that's not the point. The point is that the work-as-a-whole clause
is an immoral restriction.
Don't include GPL'ed software, then.
OK, but how is the useful to anyone?
It is useful to hundreds of thousands of developers of software under
compatible licenses who do include it, so I reject your premise that
it isn't useful to anyone.
I didn't mean no GPL-encumbered code could be useful at all. I meant
"how is your demand to not include any GPL'd software when sharing useful?".
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
