Kevin J. Cummings wrote: <snip>
Why would a Fedora Unity Re-Spin (which gets its updated RPMs from the official update repository) work any better than a system which is kept up-to-date via yum (or insert you favourite package update tool here)?
true, as as i should have responded to 'poc'. yet, to my thinking [or lack] with something in condition of 1st f9 release, i would rather install new 'fixed' in event that for some reason or other, something may have not been updated. granted, a lot of configuring has to be done and one day i will start using some sort of revision tracker, or tripwire equivalent, to handle tracking what gets changed. all in all, i do not feel that repetition is that much of a waste of my time as it does help build familiarity with a system. when there is an upgrade, ie, f8 to f9, i will not try to upgrade f8. i will keep f8 and do a new install of f9 and use both until i am sure that upgrade is working properly. then and only then will i get rid of f8. granted also, this analogy is not same as 1st f9 being replaced with f9 respin, but it is as close as i can think of now to explain my reasoning. in a way, i am like a man who wears both a belt and suspenders. cyoa. -- tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
