Re: F9: Various /var/log/messages errors....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Thurman wrote, On 07/10/2008 07:51 PM:
Todd Denniston wrote:

Dan Thurman wrote, On 07/10/2008 10:45 AM
> Ha.  No, no, not a knacker HD. It's a brand new SATA 750GB HD. I am
> installing
> "everything" for fun and then backtracking out any conflicts.  What I
> found is very
> interesting - LOTS of pitfalls and traps. Sorta like wading into a
> dungeon and dragons
> game. (Remember that old text-based-only game?)
>

Have you picked _one_ of rsyslog|ntsyslog and `rpm -e theOtherOne`?
several daemons did not seem to work right at all until we did.

I picked rsyslog.  You mean syslog-ng?  I ran into that trap
a long time ago.  That's one of `em!

and as for the ifd handlers for pcsc, you only want to have ccid and the one that someone put as a dependency of pcscd. cyberjack seems to hyjack the ifd
connections until pcscd has no chance of working.

Hm.  I have all of pcsc selected and I also have ccid selected.
Can you explain what I need to disable/choose between the
two?  I attempted to remove all `smart card' programs until
I realized how entrenched it seems - yum wants to remove
alot of files I did not want removed so I left it alone.  There
is one related to ifd and that is ifd-egate and I do not have
that selected.


for some reason they made the pcsc rpm depend on ifd-egate even though it is for ONE type of reader only, CCID controls a lot of readers and I dare say MOST recent readers. All the other ifd packages (other than egate and CCID) should be removed (not installed) if you don't know you need them, I have seen instances of pcscd taking 100% cpu with some of the others [cyberjack] installed but unused.

as far as why smart card is entrenched... well certain organizations and companies are REQUIRING PKI keys on self destroying/locking media for security reasons, because having only one thing that a user knows (password) between the bad guys and your data just is NOT good enough any more.

<SNIP>

an `rpm -verify` on the package system-config-services comes in and any it
depends on may be in order.

ok, tried it and rpm returns nothing. Must be ok.


Most likely, but sanity checks are most times a good thing to do when you know you are operating in the box wall or on the other side of it, and things seem a bit strange. :)

--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux