David Boles wrote: > A sensible person would run CentOS, or RHEL, or one of the many others, > for a server. It would be foolish to run any distro, such as Fedora, there > are many others, in a production type situation. I'm glad, and a little surprised, to find that I am not "foolish", at least in this regard. I feel I should be given a "sensible" badge. I acquired an incredibly cheap Dell server a few months ago, and somewhat to my surprise found the only OS's they supported were Centos and Windows Server (ie not what I regard as standard Windows). In fact the whole setup was Centos- or at least Linux-based, even if you were using Windows Server. I must admit Centos (5.1) has run faultlessly since I got the server. I'm pretty sure I would have had a few problems if I had been running F-9. One thing that slightly surprises me is that having a server that runs 5 times as fast, with 4 times as much memory, as my greatly-loved ancient Asus server does not in fact seem to speed anything up noticeably. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
