Ah... Yup. It should be 1680x1050 at 60hz. Thanks for catching that. >From what I have read there is no functioning way to explicitly tell X what the refresh rates should be. I've read a few posts over on fedoraforum.org and no one has successfully done so. I guess it's just going to have to be the vesa driver until nvidia gets a driver for F9s Xorg server. On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 18 May 2008 18:02:40 -0500 > "Daniel Auger" <daniel.auger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> (II) NV(0): Output DVI0 using initial mode 1680x1050 >> (--) NV(0): Virtual size is 1920x1920 (pitch 2048) >> (**) NV(0): Driver mode "1680x1050": 119.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), >> 64.7 kHz, 59.9 Hz >> (II) NV(0): Modeline "1680x1050"x59.9 119.00 1680 1728 1760 1840 >> 1050 1053 1059 1080 +hsync -vsync (64.7 kHz) > > That looks like it thinks there is a 1680x1050 LCD hooked up > and it is attempting to drive it with the EDID info from the > monitor. If that is actually correct, it must have more problems > that make it screw up when it tries to run at that rate. > > Looks like a different problem that I have (where it thinks > my 1920x1200 DELL monitor can't support anything other than 1024x768). > > I think all these problems just prove that no one anywhere in the > world was ever actually using the "nv" driver to run their nvidia > card, and now that they have no choice, the bugs are exposed :-). > > Certainly when I tried the nv driver in fedora 8, it had all the > same problems, but I never noticed because I was using the > nvidia binary driver. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
