On Sun, 18 May 2008 18:02:40 -0500 "Daniel Auger" <daniel.auger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (II) NV(0): Output DVI0 using initial mode 1680x1050 > (--) NV(0): Virtual size is 1920x1920 (pitch 2048) > (**) NV(0): Driver mode "1680x1050": 119.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), > 64.7 kHz, 59.9 Hz > (II) NV(0): Modeline "1680x1050"x59.9 119.00 1680 1728 1760 1840 > 1050 1053 1059 1080 +hsync -vsync (64.7 kHz) That looks like it thinks there is a 1680x1050 LCD hooked up and it is attempting to drive it with the EDID info from the monitor. If that is actually correct, it must have more problems that make it screw up when it tries to run at that rate. Looks like a different problem that I have (where it thinks my 1920x1200 DELL monitor can't support anything other than 1024x768). I think all these problems just prove that no one anywhere in the world was ever actually using the "nv" driver to run their nvidia card, and now that they have no choice, the bugs are exposed :-). Certainly when I tried the nv driver in fedora 8, it had all the same problems, but I never noticed because I was using the nvidia binary driver. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
