On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Andre Robatino (arobatino) <no-reply-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Andre Robatino (arobatino writes: > > > > > > > > > Is this source reliable? Is this same as Fedora 9 that is planed to be > > > > released on 13th of May? > > > > > > > The corresponding SHA1SUM file has been available from a number of open > > > mirrors for a few days now and has a > > > good signature dated May 7 from Fedora Project, so unless these ISOs get > > > pulled from all the mirrors and > > > replaced by tomorrow (unlikely since it takes a few days for the mirrors to > > > sync), yes it is. > > > > > > > Actually they have already been pulled and replaced, the earliest leak (which > > is apparently the one you're seeing there, given the May 7 date) was a RC which > > wasn't the final one. > > > > Kevin Kofler > The SHA1SUM file mentioned above is still on the mirrors as I write > this, less than 10 hours before release. The signature is usually > at least a few days before the release date. For example, the F8 > SHA1SUM is signed November 2, 2007, six days before release, and > the F7 SHA1SUM is signed May 27, 2007, four days earlier. I can't find the mirrors with SHA1SUM for Fedora 9 but ISO I downloaded has SHA1SUM: $ sha1sum Fedora-9-i686-Live.iso 3ea129ebce5fd55499a813aaa8a042735f2aad6d Fedora-9-i686-Live.iso So I'll compare it with official version tomorrow. Valent. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
