> > Kevin Kofler wrote: > Andre Robatino (arobatino writes: > > > > > > Is this source reliable? Is this same as Fedora 9 that is planed to be > > > released on 13th of May? > > > > > The corresponding SHA1SUM file has been available from a number of open > > mirrors for a few days now and has a > > good signature dated May 7 from Fedora Project, so unless these ISOs get > > pulled from all the mirrors and > > replaced by tomorrow (unlikely since it takes a few days for the mirrors to > > sync), yes it is. > > > > Actually they have already been pulled and replaced, the earliest leak (which > is apparently the one you're seeing there, given the May 7 date) was a RC which > wasn't the final one. > > Kevin Kofler The SHA1SUM file mentioned above is still on the mirrors as I write this, less than 10 hours before release. The signature is usually at least a few days before the release date. For example, the F8 SHA1SUM is signed November 2, 2007, six days before release, and the F7 SHA1SUM is signed May 27, 2007, four days earlier. -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=263498&topic_id=56314&forum=10#forumpost263498 If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and/or blame andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
