Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 23:36 -0400, max bianco wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Les <hlhowell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 13:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 >   Why should I be interested in a distribution that makes it
 > difficult
 > for me to make my own choices about whether a license is acceptable
 > or
 > not? I don't have a problem with downloading my own copy of any
 > particular code from any particular place under any conditions that I
 > find acceptable.
 But that is the problem.  The folks with proprietary want to limit your
 use to only the systems they have chosen to support, thus you can end up
 with instruments or software that you have purchased that will not run
 when the OS changes.  Furthermore their licenses forbid you from reverse
 engineering the code to figure out how to make it work some where else,
 and the owner of the proprietary OS won't let you do any reverse
 engineering legally to figure out how to interface to the software or
 hardware he/she/it chooses to no longer support.  Thus you are obsoleted
 with no legal recourse.  Those lovely sites where you download such
 utilities are often legally not clean to use either, depending upon the
 laws that the various entities have seen fit to pass.  Finally your own
 documents, code and other encoded data may be unaccessable to you
 either, because the formatting, encoding, encryption or compression may
 be proprietary and non disclosed with the attendant no reverse
 engineering clauses, leaving you without access even to your own
 material.

 That is why these licenses, and the subject of libre or free software is
 important.

 Regards,
 Les H


Adobe Flash is something I can't for the life of me figure out why
anyone would use. You can't kill the adds like you can with gnash and
it leaves a gaping security hole in everything it touches.

If you mean Firefox then Flashblock, Adblock and Noscript are all
effective. I use all three.

poc

Yes I have at one time or another tried and used them all but it strikes me as wrong to have run software A to keep software B from bothering me. Why install Flash if your going to block it anyway?

Max

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux