On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:11 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Tuesday 15 April 2008 21:10:46 Craig White wrote: > > Windows networking basics... > > > > Browser elections occur every 15 minutes. > > > > Browser election outcomes are influenced by 'os level' settings. You can > > verify this by viewing the man page for smb.conf and going to 'os level' > > section. I would also suggest that you read the section on 'preferred > > master' just below as it explains this setting. > > > > Thus if you have a network server that you want to be master and be > > capable of managing domain logons and be the domain controller (i.e. an > > NT type PDC where you would intentionally 'join' Windows systems to the > > domain)... > > > > os level = 64 > > domain master = yes > > preferred master = yes > > domain logons = yes > > > > all other samba machines on the local subnet should not have any of > > these values set. > > > > If you have a network server but don't care that it is capable of > > managing domain logons and be a domain controller and have no intention > > of joining Windows computer to a domain, probably the best setting is... > > > > os level = 64 > > preferred master = yes > > > My server is set to os-level = 66 and preferred master=yes, so they are > similar. The client boxes, however, have os-level=33 and preferred > master=no. Is there actually any harm in that? ---- it would seem to be fine ---- > > > and again, all other samba machines on the local subnet should not have > > any of these values set. > > > > I tend to only set up as a PDC where Windows systems are 'joined' to the > > domain and also use settings like 'wins support = yes' and make sure > > that DHCP sets the WINS address for each client to ensure windows name > > resolution is predictable. I am therefore less experienced with the > > former setup. > > Back to even more basic, please. I've never been in a situation of joining a > windows domain, either as a linux client or a windows one, and I know little > about domains. I've tried reading, but am no wiser. Without even the most > basic understanding of the principle, the documentation makes no sense. > Exactly what is the function gained from setting up as a PDC? ---- A lot of benefits actually... - roaming profiles - logon scripts - single sign authentication to all domain resources - consistent uid's across systems There's more but these are the ones I consider eminently valuable and accomplish essentially the same thing for Mac's and Linux systems on my network(s) via ldap/autofs thought the single sign on thing for Linux/Macs also requires kerberos. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
