On Tuesday March 25 2008 9:57:29 am Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Claude Jones <cjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue March 25 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:49 PM, David Kramer <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Also, I got disgusted with the fights between livna > > > > and atrpms a long time ago, and now I don't have a > > > > single livna package on my system. > > > > > > There in lies your problem. Always go with Livna. > > > > why? sorry, but this kind of statement always irritates me > > -- > > It also irritates me when people argue against a statement of > mine in a way tangential to my statement: he was choosing > between Livna and Atrpms. You entire rebuttal was about > freshrpms. But to respond to you, Livna an FreshRPMs work > relatively close, and I two of the repos looking to merge > together. > > Both personal experience and experience helping others say > prioritize Livna over Atrpms. Atrpms does provide some unique > packages however. > fair enough - I took your Livna comment out of context - it's something that's oft stated here and I just made a bad assumption -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
