On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Claude Jones <cjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue March 25 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:49 PM, David Kramer <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Also, I got disgusted with the fights between livna and atrpms a long > > > time ago, and now I don't have a single livna package on my system. > > > > There in lies your problem. Always go with Livna. > > > > why? sorry, but this kind of statement always irritates me -- It also irritates me when people argue against a statement of mine in a way tangential to my statement: he was choosing between Livna and Atrpms. You entire rebuttal was about freshrpms. But to respond to you, Livna an FreshRPMs work relatively close, and I two of the repos looking to merge together. Both personal experience and experience helping others say prioritize Livna over Atrpms. Atrpms does provide some unique packages however. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
