Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bradley Pursley wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
http://www.mjmwired.net/linux/2008/02/11/fedora-makes-a-terrible-server/

What is your experience ?

Cheers,
Valent.
My main concern / problem is that it doesn't seem like the updates are

Perhaps you should read this document,http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives and particularly note this para. "To be on the leading edge of free and open source technology, by adopting and helping develop new features and version upgrades."

Being on the leading edge mitigates seriously against reliability.



very well tested thereby *CAUSING* crashes, lockups, etc. Until this lack of concern is fixed, I would not recommend Fedora for servers. Something that might help is by allowing updates to be undone automatically if there is a problem and then to "lock out" that update from being applied again until the next generation of that update comes out. Another problem I've noticed is that when new software is being installed, there are no tests done to verify that it installed and is working correctly, which has been a big problem on my system. I've had to manually "fix" quite a number of the installs and sometimes when it updates the software, it undoes my fixes and I have to re-apply the fix again, which is highly aggravating. Updates should not automatically mess with the configuration files, especially if they've been manually changed, unless it prompts the system user and gives you the option of whether you want the updated file or just want to adjust the current one. For programming, this would be easy to implement without changing packaging requirements (don't overwrite older non-executable files, just rename them or move them to a "backup" location and advise user of the change).

Just my ten cents worth.

Bradley

You need to more properly understand what it is you're using. Alan (Cox) is a software developer, he has a different perspective than I have. My primary interest has been keeping systems running, and that requires a more conservative approach to systems maintenance.




--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux