Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
G'day Alan
I don't see the point of an off-list cc, I'm on the list and the round trip from here to RH and back is a few seconds.

The _only_ reason I will admit for its use as a server is for software development, where one is developing client or server against it, targetting a future release of RHEL. Then, I would use it as needed for that development, but not for other purposes.

Then I might run Fedora and Rawhide, both, for development, and test against both.

Just read this list and see how often Fedora blows up.

I think we should at this point try 'statistics for beginners'. You have
a list consisting of people who are heavily involved and people who join
because they have problems combined with a tendancy for those having
problems to be the ones who post (why email 'my server is working today'
to the list).

All that's true, but it happens fairly often that something, such as a kernel update, renders Fedora unusable, and it does not help that the default behaviour when installing a new kernel is to make the new kernel active for the next boot.

I maintain servers remotely, and while I might reboot one in the expectation that should there be a problem I have a cross-town journey, I really don't want the new kernel to be booted until my say-so.



Products such as RHEL are designed with a goal of avoiding regressions,
so what works continues to work and for many uses that is far more
preferable. To understand Fedora reliability you need to work out what to
measure. The end result of that is that while RHEL might be far less
likely to regress something that works well than Fedora, it is also far
less likely to cure something than Fedora.

Just a few minutes ago I was reading about a problem fixed in CentOS that Red Hat (apparently) wasn't interested in fixing.

I know a lot of people who run Fedora reliably on servers, including some
I'd have expected to be running enterprise products.

Presumably they know enough to not be surprised when it breaks.

--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux