On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Valent Turkovic wrote: > > Hi, > > first to say that I'm aware of current Fedora and compiz situation [1]. > > I'm not here to repeat discussion about compiz on by default but to > > start a discussion first with users and then include developers on how > > to make fedora and compiz-fusion work better. > > > > I find compiz package and not also compiz-fusion package installed a > > much needed correction by default and that is why I posted this RFE [2] > > The title of the RFE doesn't make much sense. You might want to correct > that to reflect the current discussion. > > > > Are there any of you who have some better idea how can we make fedora > > and compiz-fusion work better for users? I find that installing > > compiz-fusion is non-intuitive. Why? Because you need to install it with > > this command: > > > > yum install compiz-fusion compiz-fusion-extras compiz-fusion-gnome > > compiz-fusion-extras-gnome libcompizconfig ccsm compiz-manager > > fusion-icon-gtk > > > > how can this made easier? > > Request a meta package or yum group. > > Rahul Is "RFE: Include compiz-fusion and supporting packages by default" better? Where do I file RFE for meta package or for a yum group? (fedora wiki and google searches don't provide any info on yum meta packages). Cheers, Valent. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
