Re: Maintaining a local yum repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 11:57 -0800, Aldo Foot wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2008 8:25 AM, Derek Tattersall <tatters@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I currently have 3 computers running Fedora 8. I think it would probably
> > be a good thing to set up a local repository for yum, rather than
> > downloading each package 3 times.
> >
> > I have looked at the howto at www.howtoforge.com, and I am not really
> > happy with the method described there. It involves picking a particular
> > mirror and using rsync to keep the local repository up to date.
> >
> > It seems to me that this would have some problems. For one thing it puts
> > a bigger load on whichever mirror I am rsync'ing to. For another thing,
> > It seems to that there might be some security issues with just grabbing
> > the packages without checking the key as yum does.
> >
> > Is there a better way to keep a local repository up to date? Ideally, I
> > would like to find a way to just download the packages that my local
> > users ask for, not the whole thing. And I would prefer to use the mirror
> > list at fedora rather than just use one particular server.
> >
> > I would also prefer to automate the whole process rather than doing it
> > manually.
> >
> > Does anybody have any ideas about this? Or would I be better off just
> > continuing to use the fedora repository?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Derek Tattersall                    tatters@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> 


When I had two servers running Fedora2 and both my wife and I's
workstation, and my laptop all running FC2 - what I did was get one of
the servers to do an automatic update at say 02:00 - and do not delete
the resultant packages...

The resultant packages were then NFS shared to the rest of the systems
as a background mount.....

The result - when yum ran on the rest of the machines, if it found those
packages already on disk - it didn't re-download them - thus saving
downloading everything 5 times..

Also no problems with keys - as still using the repo ;-)

Ok - didn't stop the download of what needed to be downloaded - but that
traffic was minimal compared to the actual packages.....

Helluva lot better (IMHO) that rsyncing the entire repo  - 'cause you
won't need a vast majority of what that repo has..


Just my 2c
AM



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux