Re: New F8 kernel install error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 25 January 2008 12:48:09 am Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> >>> My list of files that match:
> >>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 128952 2007-10-18 04:49 /lib/ld-2.7.so
> >>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     17 2006-10-31 23:41 /lib/ld-linux.so.1 ->
> >>>> ld-linux.so.1.9.5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  25386 2000-02-03 09:14
> >>>> /lib/ld-linux.so.1.9.5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      9 2007-11-09 19:36
> >>>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.7.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13
> >>>> 2006-09-14 16:09 /lib/ld-lsb.so -> ld-linux.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
> >>>> root     13 2007-11-13 18:41 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 -> ld-linux.so.2
> >>>> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 99660 2000-02-03 09:14 /lib/ld.so
> >>>> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root  99660 2000-02-03 09:14 /lib/ld.so.1.9.5
> >>
> >> This is mine:
> >>
> >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 128952 2007-10-18 03:49 /lib/ld-2.7.so
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      9 2007-11-10 01:22 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ->
> >> ld-2.7.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13 2007-11-10 02:23
> >> /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 -> ld-linux.so.2
> >
> > Interesting.  Looks like I'm still got some old RPMs installed.
>
> Yeup, some *very* old RPMs still installed!  So old, they are a.out format!
>
> >>> I think that mkinitrd is at fault, not the kernel.
>
> OK, so not exactly, but mkinitrd needs a better checking methodology
> than the hack it is using.   (sigh)
>
> >> Wrong glibc libs installed ?
> >>
> >> What returns rpm -q glibc ?
> >
> > Hmmm, I wonder if its the old ld.so RPM?  I'm off to try.
>
> Yeup, removing the old ld.so (and all of the other old RPMs that
> depended on it) seem to have done it.  It was a small challenge removing
> an old csh and replacing it with tcsh, but I got it done.
>
> Installation of the mew kernel now happens without a hitch!
>
> Thanks folks for pointing out the obvious.  B^)  It made me look a
> little bit closer at what is installed on my system.  Yes, I've had to
> do some upgrades "the hard way" over the years, at one point this system
> was running RedHat 3.0.3.....  The upgrade path (as I remember it) was:
>
> 3.0.3 -> 4.2 -> 5.1 -> 6.0 -> 6.2 -> 7.2 -> 7.3 -> 9 -> FC2 -> FC3 ->
> FC 5 -> F8.   (whew!)

Think you got here a record :)

I started linux with RedHat 5.1 ...

>
> A couple of them involved me installing RPMs by hand when anaconda
> screwed up.  That probably explains some of the obsolete RPMs still
> installed.
>

best regards

Teo Fonrouge

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux