Re: New F8 kernel install error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>> My list of files that match:
>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 128952 2007-10-18 04:49 /lib/ld-2.7.so
>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     17 2006-10-31 23:41 /lib/ld-linux.so.1 ->
>>>> ld-linux.so.1.9.5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  25386 2000-02-03 09:14
>>>> /lib/ld-linux.so.1.9.5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      9 2007-11-09 19:36
>>>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.7.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13 2006-09-14
>>>> 16:09 /lib/ld-lsb.so -> ld-linux.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13
>>>> 2007-11-13 18:41 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 -> ld-linux.so.2 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root
>>>>  99660 2000-02-03 09:14 /lib/ld.so
>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root  99660 2000-02-03 09:14 /lib/ld.so.1.9.5
>> This is mine:
>>
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 128952 2007-10-18 03:49 /lib/ld-2.7.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      9 2007-11-10 01:22 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.7.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13 2007-11-10 02:23 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 -> 
>> ld-linux.so.2
> 
> Interesting.  Looks like I'm still got some old RPMs installed.

Yeup, some *very* old RPMs still installed!  So old, they are a.out format!

>>> I think that mkinitrd is at fault, not the kernel.

OK, so not exactly, but mkinitrd needs a better checking methodology
than the hack it is using.   (sigh)

>> Wrong glibc libs installed ?
>>
>> What returns rpm -q glibc ?
> 
> Hmmm, I wonder if its the old ld.so RPM?  I'm off to try.

Yeup, removing the old ld.so (and all of the other old RPMs that
depended on it) seem to have done it.  It was a small challenge removing
an old csh and replacing it with tcsh, but I got it done.

Installation of the mew kernel now happens without a hitch!

Thanks folks for pointing out the obvious.  B^)  It made me look a
little bit closer at what is installed on my system.  Yes, I've had to
do some upgrades "the hard way" over the years, at one point this system
was running RedHat 3.0.3.....  The upgrade path (as I remember it) was:

3.0.3 -> 4.2 -> 5.1 -> 6.0 -> 6.2 -> 7.2 -> 7.3 -> 9 -> FC2 -> FC3 ->
FC 5 -> F8.   (whew!)

A couple of them involved me installing RPMs by hand when anaconda
screwed up.  That probably explains some of the obsolete RPMs still
installed.

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjchome@xxxxxxx
cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux