Les Mikesell: >> Is there some reason that there isn't a standard schema shipped with the >> server that supplies what the clients in the distribution expect? Craig White: > If I understand your term 'clients' to mean an address book client like > Kontact, I would venture to guess that Kontact like Evolution and all > other address book clients each has their own schema. If you are > decrying that all of the various address book clients all have differing > notions about schema's, then you should take that up with them. I would think that Les was thinking what I was: If you supply a distribution with specific LDAP and mail software, that you'd also supply the bits that allowed them to work together, particularly your flagship products. e.g. Configurations to suit using LDAP with Evolution, kmail, Thunderbird, etc. You can't really expect Evolution, et al, to supply it, because they don't know what LDAP server you've included. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.23.12-52.fc7 i686 i386 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
