Re: LDAP be killing me. I need a good step by step

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 22:49 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 22:39 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> Craig White wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 14:16 +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >>>> Brian Millett wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have a file of names, phone numbers, etc. that has the following format
> >>>>> that is used at my work:
> >>>>> Name|Email|Ext.|Home #|Cellular #|Pager|Title
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sample data:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Baker, Steve B.|sbb|15|314-215-4141|314-591-8181|| Director of Technology
> >>>>> Bowland, Chris|cyb|33|314-835-1216||314-663-3132|Java Developer
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wrote a perl script to parse this and put it into a valid ldif format:
> >>>> Thanks for your script, which I shall study.
> >>>>
> >>>> But one problem with setting up an address book in this way
> >>>> is that there seems to be no standard LDAP format for addresses,
> >>>> and an email client probably will not understand a particular format.
> >>>>
> >>>> For example, I use kmail, which claims to understand LDAP.
> >>>> But if you export your kmail (or kaddressbook) list in LDIF format
> >>>> it is more of less useless for putting on an openldap server.
> >>>>
> >>>> As far as I can see, the only reasonably general format for this is vCard
> >>>> (which is more or less what kmail uses)
> >>>> but there doesn't seem to be any standard way
> >>>> of translating vCard to LDAP (or LDIF) format.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's amazing to me that there is not a standard way
> >>>> of putting an address book on an openldap server
> >>>> which can be understood by all email clients
> >>>> since this seems to be the major use of openldap.
> >>>>
> >>>> But I am far from expert in this subject;
> >>>> perhaps I have misunderstood the situation?
> >>> ----
> >>> On Fedora (I think, for certain on RHEL), the openldap-servers comes
> >>> with many 'migration' scripts from padl that can take static file
> >>> entries (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group, /etc/hosts...) and
> >>> migrate them into an LDIF which you can then import. Their scripts are
> >>> very, very good and should be the basis for anyone looking to migrate to
> >>> LDAP.
> >>>
> >>> Address Book clients such as Kontact (which is what Kmail would use), or
> >>> Thunderbird, Evolution, Outlook, etc. all have differing notions of
> >>> which attributes LDAP should offer. Let me repeat this another
> >>> way...THERE ARE NO STANDARDS for attributes that Address Book client
> >>> applications will use. This can be viewed as a negative or a positive.
> >>> Positive because you can support a variety of address book clients in a
> >>> variety of ways. Negative because if you don't know what you're doing,
> >>> it's confusing.
> >>>
> >>> Therefore, whatever any program exports as an LDIF will differ from each
> >>> other program and it's up to the 'administrator' to do find/replace for
> >>> the attributes that they intend to use on the LDAP server...the only
> >>> other way is the Microsoft way which is prescribed. Once you absorb the
> >>> methodology, it becomes clear that the Microsoft way is limiting.
> >> Funny....  I knew that Ric's extremely general question was going to fan out 
> >> to be much more than he thought he was asking......
> >>
> >> I'd dump all that I know about ldap here....but it would take me too long to 
> >> type it all and maybe never answer the question that Ric thinks he is 
> >> asking.  :-)
> > ----
> > lateral answer, I directed him to the Administrator's Guide on the
> > OpenLDAP's website.
> > 
> > This was simply a clarification on why different address book clients
> > write different attributes in an exported LDIF file which probably will
> > fail when you try to ldapadd/slapadd them into LDAP
> 
> Right....but he can't even get as far as getting an ldap server running. 
> Or, that is my take from his initial query.  So, getting into depth about 
> what clients are expecting from the ldap server is putting the cart before 
> the horse....so to speak.
----
hence my previous direction to Administrator Guide

useless and unresponsive answers is not the exclusive domain of a select
few.

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux