David G. Mackay wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 08:54 +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
Future development is with ath5k; I surmise it's more likely to work
than madwifi for some (probably newer) devices. Fedora aims to provide
the latest in open source; madwifi isn't all open source, and ath5k is
the latest.
My chipset isn't supported in either the madwifi or ath5k stable
versions. It's a lot easier to do an svn checkout of madwifi than to do
the git kernel compile needed for ath5k. That said, I do look forward
to the day when my chipset is supported in ath5k. Maybe then, NM will
play nicely again.
nm has many problems unrelated to this.
No fault of the developers, the main things work for many people, but
there are many cases where it doesn't. Two network interfaces for one.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
