Marcel Janssen wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
If madwifi isn't working then ath5k isn't going to work either.
madwifi supports more hardware than ath5k.
I've got a similar problem as the original post. I wonder how I make sure the
madwifi driver is used instead of the ath5k driver.
If the madwifi driver supports more hardware wouldn't it make sense to not use
the ath5k driver at all ?
Future development is with ath5k; I surmise it's more likely to work
than madwifi for some (probably newer) devices. Fedora aims to provide
the latest in open source; madwifi isn't all open source, and ath5k is
the latest.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
